Friday, 28 February 2014
Evaluation - Question 1 - "In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?"
This is my evaluation question 1 which answers the question "In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?". This was a group project and it features all of our group talking about the different sections which we needed to cover whilst answering this question.
Evaluation- Question 3 - "What have you learnt from your adueince feedback?"
This is my evaluation question 3 which was a group, joint project and it features all of us answering the question. It meant that we were all featured and could say our bit as a group.
Monday, 24 February 2014
Evaluation - Question 2 - "How effective is the combination of your main products and ancillary texts?"
This is my own personal response to evaluation question 2 which set out to answer the question "how effective is the combination of your main products and ancillary texts?". It features my own views and opinions on the answer to the question. It also features clips of myself talking towards the camera as it makes the evaluation question that little bit more personal.
Filming Log 9
14th of January 2014
For this filming session we filed Andrew using the GoPro. We used this piece of equipment in two ways; 1, Andrew holding it himself and 2, having someone else film it from further back like the other walking shots we carried out.
As we were filming by a main road the shots were very noisy and Andrew found that he was finding it hard to hear the music over the top of the traffic. This meant that the lip syhcning was slightly off which wasn't very easy to pick up on when it came to editing the footage. Also, because of the noise of the traffic it was hard to synch up the music in the footage to the actual music within our track.
The hand-held shots that were filmed by andrew were clear, and less shaky then the previous walking shots that we have filmed. This meant that the footage looked cleaner and more professional to use within our music video in comparison to the original footage that we have within it.
Over all I believe that this filming session was successful as we gained the footage that we set out to film and they were clear, more usable shots. The filming session was also very quick because we had already planned before hand what we needed to get done within the time frame that we had given ourselves to carry out the filming.
For this filming session we filed Andrew using the GoPro. We used this piece of equipment in two ways; 1, Andrew holding it himself and 2, having someone else film it from further back like the other walking shots we carried out.
As we were filming by a main road the shots were very noisy and Andrew found that he was finding it hard to hear the music over the top of the traffic. This meant that the lip syhcning was slightly off which wasn't very easy to pick up on when it came to editing the footage. Also, because of the noise of the traffic it was hard to synch up the music in the footage to the actual music within our track.
The hand-held shots that were filmed by andrew were clear, and less shaky then the previous walking shots that we have filmed. This meant that the footage looked cleaner and more professional to use within our music video in comparison to the original footage that we have within it.
Over all I believe that this filming session was successful as we gained the footage that we set out to film and they were clear, more usable shots. The filming session was also very quick because we had already planned before hand what we needed to get done within the time frame that we had given ourselves to carry out the filming.
Saturday, 22 February 2014
Evaluation - Question 4 - "How did you use new Media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?"
This is my own personal Prezi which answers question 4 of the evaluation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)